Padilla v. Department of the Navy et al
| Arthur Padilla |
| Department of the Navy, United States of America and Does 1 through 50 |
| 3:2017cv01182 |
| June 13, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Nita L. Stormes |
| Thomas J. Whelan |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2401 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
165
ORDER Granting 151 Motion for Partial Findings and Judgment. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 3/24/2021. (ag)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER Regarding Joint Motion on Discovery Dispute re 59 65 . The Court denies as moot Plaintiff's request to reopen discovery, grants Plaintiff's request to produce Dr. Simon's supplement to Defendant, and denies Defendant's mo tion for automatic exclusion of the supplement under Rule 37(c)(1) in the parties' Joint Motion. Additionally, the Court denies as moot the parties' withdrawn Joint Motion on the same discovery dispute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard on 10/22/2019. (jao)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER: (1) Denying 29 Defendant's Motion to Strike; (2) Denying 33 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike; (3) Granting in part and Denying in part 21 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Thomas J. Whelan on 5/3/2019. (jao)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER Denying 4 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss As Moot. Signed by Judge Thomas J. Whelan on 12/1/2017. (jao)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
