Parker v. Saul
Plaintiff: Sharlene Chiquita Parker
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Case Number: 3:2020cv02530
Filed: December 30, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Barbara Lynn Major
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 26 U.S.C. ยง 7405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sharlene Chiquita Parker. Andrew Saul served. (jpp)
February 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sharlene Chiquita Parker. U.S. Attorney General served. (jpp)
February 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sharlene Chiquita Parker. U.S. Attorney San Diego served. (jpp)
February 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Sharon Lahey on behalf of Andrew Saul (Lahey, Sharon)Attorney Sharon Lahey added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft) (jpp).
January 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, Pursuant to General Order 707, by Sharlene Chiquita Parker. (mcb)
January 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (Attachments: #1 in forma pauperis letter)(jpp)
January 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Plaintiff's application to Proceed in District Court without prepaying fees or costs. US Marshal shall effect service of complaint. (Summons and IFP package prepared). Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 1/04/2021. (jpp) (dlg).
December 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE OF SOCIAL SECURITY CASE ASSIGNMENT. Pursuant to General Order 707, United States Magistrate Barbara Lynn Major has been randomly assigned. Plaintiff should print and complete the attached consent/declination form. The executed form must be received by the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of this notice. (smd)
December 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Sharlene Chiquita Parker. No Parties With Financial Interest. (smd) (sjt).
December 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Sharlene Chiquita Parker. (smd) (sjt).
December 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, IFP Filed, filed by Sharlene Chiquita Parker. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:20-cv-2530-BLM. Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major is assigned to the case. (Haley, Denise)(smd) (sjt).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Parker v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Represented By: Sharon Lahey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sharlene Chiquita Parker
Represented By: Denise L Bourgeois Haley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?