Rolando Esteban Sanchez v. Raymond Madden
| Rolando Esteban Sanchez |
| Raymond Madden |
| 3:2021cv01072 |
| June 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Michael M Anello |
| Mitchell D Dembin |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER Granting #13 Petitioner's Request for Copies of Documents and Denying #13 Petitioner's Requests for Appointment of Counsel and Expedited Review. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin on 7/28/2021. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service and Petitioner mailed ECF Nos. 7, 8, 9, 10 and 13) (tcf)
|
|
Filing 13
Request for Expedited Review, Copies of All Documents, Appointment of Counsel, and Order Granting Petition by Rolando Esteban Sanchez. Nunc Pro Tunc 7/19/2021. (tcf).
|
|
Filing 12
Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin Accepting Document: Request for Expedited Review, Copies of All Documents, Appointment of Counsel, and Order Granting Petition, from Petitioner Rolando Esteban Sanchez. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Civ. L. Rule 5.1: All documents submitted for filing must be filed and captioned separately. Multiple pleadings in one filing not proper. Nunc Pro Tunc 7/19/2021. Signed by the Chambers of Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin on 7/21/2021. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Appearance by Linnea D. Piazza on behalf of Raymond Madden (Piazza, Linnea)Attorney Linnea D. Piazza added to party Raymond Madden(pty:res)(jms).
|
|
Filing 10
Fee for Habeas Petition: Paid on 7/12/2021. (jms) (jms).
|
|
Filing 9
Order Requiring Response to Petition (28 U.S.C. 2254). Respondent must file a Notice of Appearance no later than 7/19/21. Answer by Respondent due 9/6/2021. Traverse by Petitioner due 10/6/2021. Motion to Dismiss Deadline 9/6/2021. Opposition Motion to Dismiss due 10/6/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin on 6/30/21.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service and Attorney General with petition and order )(jmo)
|
|
Filing 8
Fee for Habeas Petition: Paid on 6/29/2021. (jms) (jms).
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without Prejudice. To have this case reopened, Petitioner must submit, no later than August 16, 2021, a copy of this Order with the $5.00 fee or with adequate proof of his inability to pay the fee.. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 6/16/2021. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service and blank IFP application sent to Petitioner.) (tcf)
|
|
Filing 5
Case transferred in from the Central District of California; Case Number 2:21-cv-04600-DOC-GJS. Original file received electronically.
|
|
Filing 6
Judge Michael M. Anello and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin assigned to transfer case from Central District of California. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(no document attached) (jms)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER by Judge David O. Carter transferring case to Southern District of California. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall transfer this matter to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. Original file, certified copy of the transfer order and docket sheet electronically sent. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (twdb) [Transferred from California Central on 6/8/2021.]
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV-111) (lh) [Transferred from California Central on 6/8/2021.]
|
|
Filing 2
ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Rolando Esteban Sanchez. (lh) [Transferred from California Central on 6/8/2021.]
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254). Case assigned to Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge G.(Filing Fee $5 Due), filed by Petitioner Rolando Esteban Sanchez. (lh) [Transferred from California Central on 6/8/2021.]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rolando Esteban Sanchez v. Raymond Madden | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Rolando Esteban Sanchez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Raymond Madden | |
| Represented By: | Attorney General |
| Represented By: | Linnea D. Piazza |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
