Whyte v. City of San Diego et al
| Michael Whyte, Dorion Jackett and Kanius Hill |
| Does 1-25, David Nisleit, San Diego Police Department Officer Sterling (badge # unknown) and City of San Diego |
| 3:2021cv01159 |
| June 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Larry Alan Burns |
| Mitchell D Dembin |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 cv |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
AMENDED Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jmr)
|
|
Filing 3
AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Michael Whyte.New Summons Requested. (Pride, Dante) (jmr).
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (jmr)(jrd)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against City of San Diego, Does 1-25, David Nisleit, San Diego Police Department Officer Sterling (badge # unknown) ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-15858977.), filed by Michael Whyte. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:21-cv-1159-LAB-MDD. Judge Larry Alan Burns and Magistrate Judge Mitchell D. Dembin are assigned to the case. (Pride, Dante)(jmr)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
