Dones v. Allison

Dones v. Allison

Petitioner:	Tommy Pedro Dones
Respondent:	Kathleen Allison
Case Number:	3:2022cv00282
Filed:	March 1, 2022
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office:	San Diego Office
Presiding Judge:	Michael M Anello
Referring Judge:	Barbara Lynn Major
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

RSS Track this Docket

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed	Document Text
March 3, 2022	Filing 2 Order Requiring Response to Petition (28 U.S.C. 2254). Respondent must file a motion to dismiss no later than 5/6/2022. If Respondent files a motion to dismiss, Petitioner must file his opposition, if any, to the motion no later than 6/6/2022. Respondent must file and serve an answer to the Petition no later than 5/6/2022. Petitioner may file a traverse to matters raised in the answer no later than 6/6/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 3/3/2022. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf)
March 1, 2022	Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Kathleen Allison (Filing fee $5, paid, receipt number CAS136301.), filed by Tommy Pedro Dones. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Denials and Reviews, #3 Appellate Docs, #4 Preliminary Hearing Transcript, #5 Medical and Psychological Docs, #6 Emails and Atty Correspondence, #7 Fee Receipt)The new case number is 3:22-cv-282-MMA-BLM. Judge Michael M. Anello and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major are assigned to the case.(smy1).

Date Filed

Document Text

March 3, 2022

Filing 2 Order Requiring Response to Petition (28 U.S.C. 2254). Respondent must file a motion to dismiss no later than 5/6/2022. If Respondent files a motion to dismiss, Petitioner must file his opposition, if any, to the motion no later than 6/6/2022. Respondent must file and serve an answer to the Petition no later than 5/6/2022. Petitioner may file a traverse to matters raised in the answer no later than 6/6/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 3/3/2022. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (tcf)

March 1, 2022

Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Kathleen Allison (Filing fee $5, paid, receipt number CAS136301.), filed by Tommy Pedro Dones. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Denials and Reviews, #3 Appellate Docs, #4 Preliminary Hearing Transcript, #5 Medical and Psychological Docs, #6 Emails and Atty Correspondence, #7 Fee Receipt)The new case number is 3:22-cv-282-MMA-BLM. Judge Michael M. Anello and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major are assigned to the case.(smy1).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dones v. Allison
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Tommy Pedro Dones
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Kathleen Allison
Represented By:	Attorney General
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?