Borzouei v. Bitter et al
| Navid Borzouei |
| Rena Bitter, Sean Murphy and Antony Blinken |
| 3:2022cv00872 |
| June 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Michael M Anello |
| Roger T Benitez |
| Karen S Crawford |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Navid Borzouei. Rena Bitter, Antony Blinken, Sean Murphy served. (Goldstein, Joshua) (tcf).
|
|
Filing 3
MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Roger T. Benitez is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Judge Michael M. Anello for all further proceedings. The new case number is 22-cv-00872-MMA-KSC.(no document attached) (ddf)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (alns) (jms).
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION against Rena Bitter, Antony Blinken, Sean Murphy ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-16915489.), filed by Navid Borzouei. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:22-cv-872-BEN-KSC. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case. (Goldstein, Joshua)(alns)(jms).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
