Turner v. Real Time Solutions, Inc. et al
| Matthew Turner |
| Real Time Solutions, Inc., Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC and Does 1-50 |
| 3:2022cv01121 |
| August 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Michael M Anello |
| William V Gallo |
| Real Property: Other |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 2605 RESPA: Servicing of Mortgage Loans |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Minute Order Taking Motion Under Submission: Defendant Real Time Solutions, Inc.'s #4 MOTION to Dismiss is currently set for hearing on September 26, 2022. The Court finds this matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. Accordingly, no appearances are required, and the hearing is taken off calendar. SO ORDERED by Judge Michael M. Anello on September 15, 2022. (no document attached) (kff)
|
|
Filing 9
REPLY to Response to Motion re #4 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Real Time Solutions, Inc. (Lucey, Nathaniel) (tcf).
|
|
Filing 8
Minute Order Taking Motion Under Submission: Defendant Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC's #3 MOTION to Dismiss is currently set for hearing on September 19, 2022. The Court finds this matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. Accordingly, no appearances are required, and the hearing is taken off calendar. SO ORDERED by Judge Michael M. Anello on September 12, 2022. (no document attached) (kff)
|
|
Filing 7
REPLY to Response to Motion re #3 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC. (Norman, Robert) (tcf).
|
|
Filing 6
RESPONSE to Motion re #4 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint PLAINTIFF MATTHEW TURNERS MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT REAL TIME SOLUTIONS INC.S MOTION TO DISMISS filed by Matthew Turner. (Shapero, Sarah) (tcf).
|
|
Filing 5
RESPONSE in Opposition re #3 MOTION to Dismiss PLAINTIFF MATTHEW TURNERS MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, LLCS MOTION TO DISMISS filed by Matthew Turner. (Shapero, Sarah) (ddf).
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Real Time Solutions, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Request for Judicial Notice)(Lucey, Nathaniel) (tcf).
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Dismiss by Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Exhibits 1-7)(Norman, Robert) (tcf).
|
|
Filing 2
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC identifying Other Affiliate Specialized Loan Servicing Holdings LLC, Other Affiliate Computershare US Investments LLC, Other Affiliate Computershare Holdings, Inc., Other Affiliate Computershare Mortgage Services Inc. for Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC. (Norman, Robert) (tcf).
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACASDC-17038463.) Filed by Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A-B, #3 Joinder in Notice of Removal)The new case number is 3:22-cv-1121-MMA-WVG. Judge Michael M. Anello and Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo are assigned to the case.(cxl1) (sjt).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
