US v. Rodriguez-Martinez

Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: JOSE L. RODRIGUEZ-MARTINEZ
Case Number: 13-1633
Filed: May 15, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
February 20, 2015 Summary United States v. Rodriguez-Martinez
April 24, 2015 Summary US v. Rodriguez-Martinez

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 20, 2015 106801386 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION issued by Jeffrey R. Howard, Appellate Judge; Kermit V. Lipez, Appellate Judge and David J. Barron, Appellate Judge. Published. [13-1633, 13-1657]
April 24, 2015 106827463 Opinion or Order of the Court ERRATA issued by court to opinion (published) [5887620-2]. [13-1633, 13-1657]
Search for this case: US v. Rodriguez-Martinez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Represented By: Dennise Noemi Longo-Quinones
Represented By: Justin Reid Martin
Represented By: Nelson Jose Perez-Sosa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: JOSE L. RODRIGUEZ-MARTINEZ
Represented By: Carlos A. Vazquez-Alvarez
Represented By: Hector E. Guzman-Silva
Represented By: Sulay Rios-Fuentes
Represented By: Jose L. Rodriguez-Martinez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.