Fahey v. MA Dept of Revenue
| BRIAN S. FAHEY |
| MA DEPT OF REVENUE |
| 14-1328 |
| March 26, 2014 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit |
| Appeal 28 USC 158 |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Fahey v. Mass. Dept of Revenue
|
|
Fahey v. MA Dept of Revenue, Perkins v. MA Department of Revenue, Gonzalez v. MA Dept of Revenue, Brown v. MA Dept of Revenue
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106800224
OPINION issued by Juan R. Torruella, Appellate Judge; Rogeriee Thompson, Appellate Judge and William J. Kayatta , Jr., Appellate Judge. Published. [14-1328, 14-1350]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Fahey v. MA Dept of Revenue | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellant: BRIAN S. FAHEY | |
| Represented By: | Andrew L. Barrett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Appellee: MA DEPT OF REVENUE | |
| Represented By: | Daniel John Hammond |
| Represented By: | Celine E. Jackson |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey S. Ogilvie |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
