US v. Gall
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: RONALD GALL
Case Number: 14-1948
Filed: September 17, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 15, 2016 Summary United States v. Gall

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 107029733 OPINION issued by William J. Kayatta , Jr., Appellate Judge; David J. Barron, Appellate Judge and Steven J. McAuliffe, U.S. District Judge*. Published. *Of the District of New Hampshire, sitting by designation. [14-1948]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: US v. Gall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Represented By: Nelson Jose Perez-Sosa
Represented By: Jorge A. Ramos Fernandez
Represented By: Kelley Leann Tiffany
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: RONALD GALL
Represented By: Melanie Carrillo-Jimenez
Represented By: Ronald Gall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?