Sullivan v. Marchilli
Petitioner - Appellant: MARK SULLIVAN
Respondent - Appellee: RAYMOND MARCHILLI, Superintendent
Case Number: 15-1191
Filed: February 18, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: General (Habeas Corpus)

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 1, 2016 Summary Sullivan v. Marchilli

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 107023246 OPINION issued by David J. Barron, Appellate Judge; David H. Souter, Associate Supreme Court Justice* and Bruce M. Selya, Appellate Judge. Published. * Hon. David H. Souter, Associate Justice (Ret.) of the Supreme Court of the United States, sitting by designation. [15-1191]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Sullivan v. Marchilli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: MARK SULLIVAN
Represented By: Janet Hetherwick Pumphrey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: RAYMOND MARCHILLI, Superintendent
Represented By: Ryan Edmund Ferch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?