James Dennis v. Secretary PA Department of Cor, et al
Plaintiff - Appellee: JAMES A. DENNIS
Defendant - Appellant: SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI
Case Number: 13-9003
Filed: September 30, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Presiding Judge:
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: Death Penalty

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 9, 2015 Summary Dennis v. Sec’y, Pa. Dep’t of Corr.
May 6, 2015 Summary James Dennis v. Secretary PA Department of Cor
August 23, 2016 Summary Dennis v. Sec'y PA Dept. of Corrs.
August 23, 2016 Summary James Dennis v. Secretary PA Department of Cor

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3012388300 ORDER (Clerk) AMENDING OPINION at the direction of the Court, filed.
May 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 3011954179 ORDER filed (Coram: MCKEE, Chief Judge, RENDELL, AMBRO, FUENTES, SMITH, FISHER, CHAGARES, JORDAN, HARDIMAN, GREENAWAY JR., VANASKIE, SHWARTZ and KRAUSE, Circuit Judges) granting Petition for En Banc Rehearing and vacating the opinion and judgment filed February 9, 2015, filed. Authoring Judge: Chief Judge McKee.
February 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 3011871375 PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: SMITH, FISHER and CHAGARES, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 33. Judge: FISHER Authoring.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: James Dennis v. Secretary PA Department of Cor, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: JAMES A. DENNIS
Represented By: James W. Cooper
Represented By: Melanie Gavisk
Represented By: Rebecca Gordon
Represented By: Ryan D. Guilds
Represented By: Stuart B. Lev
Represented By: Meghan Martin
Represented By: Amy L. Rohe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Represented By: Thomas W. Dolgenos
Represented By: Ryan Dunlavey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI
Represented By: Thomas W. Dolgenos
Represented By: Ryan Dunlavey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Represented By: Thomas W. Dolgenos
Represented By: Ryan Dunlavey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI
Represented By: Thomas W. Dolgenos
Represented By: Ryan Dunlavey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?