Cases 1 - 10 of 192
Jason Maines v. Superintendent Greene SCI, et al
as 24-2878
Plaintiff:
JASON ALLEN MAINES
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY CAMBRIA COUNTY and SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI
Edward Friedland v. Superintendent Greene SCI, et al
as 24-2792
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, S
Plaintiff:
EDWARD FRIEDLAND
William Housman v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-2628
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HOUSMAN
Richard Grosso v. Superintendent Greene SCI, et al
as 24-2464
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERIE COUNTY
Plaintiff:
RICHARD E. GROSSO
Beau Chermer v. Superintendent Greene SCI, et al
as 24-2325
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BEAVER COUNTY
Plaintiff:
BEAU CHERMER
Neil Pal v. Superintendent Greene SCI, et al
as 24-2196
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LACKAWANNA COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff:
NEIL PAL
Edwin Romero v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-2105
Plaintiff:
EDWIN ROMERO
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI
Edwin Romero v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-2015
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI and SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Plaintiff:
EDWIN ROMERO
Nasir Elliott v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1959
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI
Plaintiff:
NASIR ELLIOTT
Arthur Bomar v. Superintendent Greene SCI, et al
as 24-9001
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR BOMAR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.