Shane McCrommon v. Superintendent Greene SCI, et al
| SHANE LENELL MCCROMMON |
| SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY WESTMORELAND COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA |
| 24-1561 |
| March 27, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION filed by Appellant Shane Lenell McCrommon for Extension of Time to File an Application for Certificate of Appealability forwarded by the District Court. Response, if any, due on 04/08/2024. (CJG) [Entered: 03/28/2024 12:11 PM] |
| Filing 5 Notice received from district court that ifp has been granted to Appellant Shane Lenell McCrommon. (CJG) [Entered: 03/28/2024 12:08 PM] |
| Filing 4 COPY OF ORDER OF DISTRICT COURT dated 03/28/2024 signed by Mark R. Hornak forwarding Appellant's Motion for Extension of Time to File Application for Certificate of Appealability to the Court of Appeals. (CJG) [Entered: 03/28/2024 12:06 PM] |
| Filing 3 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (CJG) [Entered: 03/27/2024 03:56 PM] |
| Filing 2 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (CJG) [Entered: 03/27/2024 03:55 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Shane Lenell McCrommon in District Court No. 2-19-cv-00121. (CJG) [Entered: 03/27/2024 03:49 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
