Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,897
George Druck v. Superintendent Houtzdale SCI
as 24-2045
Plaintiff: GEORGE DRUCK
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT HOUTZDALE SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Donte Cannon v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-2074
Plaintiff: DONTE CANNON
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Daryl Hayden v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 24-2075
Plaintiff: DARYL T. HAYDEN
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Rodney Derrickson v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 24-2047
Plaintiff: RODNEY DERRICKSON
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY
Jamal Ali v. District Attorney Philadelphia, et al
as 24-2000
Plaintiff: JAMAL ALI
Defendant: DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI
Vernon Robinson v. Warden Fort Dix FCI, et al
as 24-1999
Plaintiff: VERNON ROBINSON
Defendant: WARDEN FORT DIX FCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LYCOMING COUNTY
Calvin Lynch v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-1972
Plaintiff: CALVIN B. LYNCH
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY
Ronald Davis v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 24-1958
Plaintiff: RONALD DAVIS
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY MONTGOMERY COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Nasir Elliott v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1959
Plaintiff: NASIR ELLIOTT
Defendant: ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI
Neil Pal v. , et alIn re: Neil Pal v. , et al
as 24-1940
Petitioner: In re: NEIL PAL
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY LACKAWANNA COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?