Ramon Mota v. Attorney General United State
RAMON ANTONIO MOTA, a/k/a Ramon Mota, AKA Ramon Antonio Mota De Los Santos |
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
15-2039 |
April 27, 2015 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Ramon Mota v. Attorney General United States |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3012117549 NOT PRECEDENTIAL PER CURIAM OPINION Coram: AMBRO, SHWARTZ and GREENBERG, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 5. ALD-027 The motion to supplement the record is denied as moot. |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Ramon Mota v. Attorney General United State | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: RAMON ANTONIO MOTA, a/k/a Ramon Mota, AKA Ramon Antonio Mota De Los Santos | |
Represented By: | Ramon Antonio Mota |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Eric H. Holder |
Represented By: | Thomas W. Hussey |
Represented By: | Benjamin M. Moss |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.