Cases 1 - 10 of 4,498
Murray Braun v. USA, et al
as 21-5088
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of the Treasury, United States Department of Justice, Deborah L. Connor, Interim Special Master
and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Murray Braun
Mario Casiero-Antonio v. Attorney General United States
as 21-1852
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
MARIO CASIERO-ANTONIO
Juliana Rodriguez-Mejia De Ca v. Attorney General United States
as 21-1835
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
JULIANA RODRIGUEZ-MEJIA DE CALO
Butts v. United States of America et al
as 2:2021cv00756
Respondent:
United States of America, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Paul Richard Butts
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Oscar Suarez-Varela v. Attorney General United States
as 21-1818
Petitioner:
OSCAR LEONEL SUAREZ-VARELA
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Danny Castellanos Ramos v. Attorney General United States
as 21-1816
Petitioner:
DANNY JUNIOR CASTELLANOS RAMOS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Franciszek Bystron v. Attorney General United States
as 21-1807
Petitioner:
FRANCISZEK KRAZSZTOF BYSTRON
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Parvez Ahamed v. Attorney General United States
as 21-1815
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
PARVEZ AHAMED
Kitano Jordan v. Attorney General United States, et al
as 21-1801
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KITANO JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, M.D. CARUAJAL, Chief Executive of the Bureau of Prisons, JOHN DOE, Chief Deputy Attorney General of District
and others
Frederick Banks v. President USA, et al
as 21-1777
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PRESIDENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
