Jerrell Johnson v. Stephen Rankin

Plaintiff - Appellant: JERRELL R. JOHNSON, Administrator of the Estate of Kirill Denyakin, Deceased
Defendant - Appellee: STEPHEN D. RANKIN, Individually and in his Official Capacity as a Police Officer for the City of Portsmouth, Virginia
Case Number: 12-1414
Filed: April 2, 2012
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
December 2, 2013 Jerrell Johnson v. Stephen Rankin

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 2, 2013 404746046 Opinion or Order of the Court UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:11-cv-00415-RBS-TEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999249434].. [12-1414]
Search for this case: Jerrell Johnson v. Stephen Rankin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: JERRELL R. JOHNSON, Administrator of the Estate of Kirill Denyakin, Deceased
Represented By: Carlton Frank Bennett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: STEPHEN D. RANKIN, Individually and in his Official Capacity as a Police Officer for the City of Portsmouth, Virginia
Represented By: Kenneth Abrams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.