Midland Mortgage Company v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA

Defendant - Appellee: WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, a national banking association
Plaintiff - Appellant: MIDLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY, a South Carolina Corporation
Case Number: 13-1370
Filed: March 21, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
October 30, 2013 Midland Mortgage Company v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 30, 2013 404704652 Opinion or Order of the Court UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:12-cv-00244-MBS Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999229693].. [13-1370]
Search for this case: Midland Mortgage Company v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, a national banking association
Represented By: Lawrence Michael Hershon
Represented By: Ronald James Tryon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: MIDLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY, a South Carolina Corporation
Represented By: Jordan M. O'Brien
Represented By: William Wharton Watkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.