Sparkle Thompson v. Carolyn Colvin
Plaintiff - Appellant: SPARKLE THOMPSON
Defendant - Appellee: CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 13-2374
Filed: November 13, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: S.S.I.D.

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 30, 2014 Sparkle Thompson v. Carolyn Colvin

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 405080126 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:12-cv-00399-GCM-DCK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999405941].. [13-2374]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Sparkle Thompson v. Carolyn Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: SPARKLE THOMPSON
Represented By: Daniel Richard Lauffer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Lucy Albright Bezdek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?