Jeffrey Hodges v. Federal-Mogul Corporation
Defendant: CARRINGTON ENGINEERING SALES COMPANY, LLC and CECO ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION
Plaintiff - Appellant: JEFFREY S. HODGES, TOMMY LEE BONDS and JOHN PAUL SPANGLER
Defendant - Appellee: FEDERAL-MOGUL CORPORATION, Q-TECH EQUIPMENT & SERVICES OF THE CAROLINAS, L.L.C., CARRINGTON ENGINEERING SALES CO., CARRINGTON ENGINEERING SALES, DUSTEX CORPORATION, THE KIRK & BLUM MANUFACTURING COMPANY and K&B DUCT
Case Number: 14-1333
Filed: April 10, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 8, 2015 Jeffrey Hodges v. Federal-Mogul Corporation

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 405533426 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:12-cv-00362-MFU-RSB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999616726].. [14-1333]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Jeffrey Hodges v. Federal-Mogul Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: JEFFREY S. HODGES
Represented By: Peter Brent Brown
Represented By: Neal Stanley Johnson
Represented By: Edward Kyle McNew
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: TOMMY LEE BONDS
Represented By: Peter Brent Brown
Represented By: Neal Stanley Johnson
Represented By: Edward Kyle McNew
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: JOHN PAUL SPANGLER
Represented By: Peter Brent Brown
Represented By: Neal Stanley Johnson
Represented By: Edward Kyle McNew
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: FEDERAL-MOGUL CORPORATION
Represented By: Edward Scott Austin
Represented By: Guy M. Harbert
Represented By: Daniel Robert Sullivan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: Q-TECH EQUIPMENT & SERVICES OF THE CAROLINAS, L.L.C.
Represented By: Bevin Ray Alexander
Represented By: James Barrett Lucy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: CARRINGTON ENGINEERING SALES CO.
Represented By: Bevin Ray Alexander
Represented By: James Barrett Lucy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: CARRINGTON ENGINEERING SALES
Represented By: Bevin Ray Alexander
Represented By: James Barrett Lucy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: DUSTEX CORPORATION
Represented By: David Drake Hudgins
Represented By: Sean Charles Edward McDonough
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: THE KIRK & BLUM MANUFACTURING COMPANY
Represented By: Donald Edward Morris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: K&B DUCT
Represented By: Donald Edward Morris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CARRINGTON ENGINEERING SALES COMPANY, LLC
Represented By:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CECO ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION
Represented By:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?