In re: Sylvester Kelly

Petitioner: In re: SYLVESTER KELLY
:
Case Number: 14-1688
Filed: July 11, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
December 31, 2014 In Re: Sylvester Kelly

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 31, 2014 405287982 Opinion or Order of the Court UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus as moot (FRAP 21) [999393933-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999418353-2]. Originating case number: 1:06-cr-00297-CMH-3. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999502679]. Mailed to: Sylvester Kelly. [14-1688]
Search for this case: In re: Sylvester Kelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: SYLVESTER KELLY
Represented By: Sylvester Kelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Represented By: Leonor V. Davila
Represented By: Dennis Michael Fitzpatrick
Represented By: Jenny R. Hernandez
Represented By: Kondi J. Kleinman
Represented By: Lawrence Joseph Leiser
Represented By: John Edward Sinfelt
Represented By: Karen Ledbetter Taylor
Represented By: Anna A. Vlasova
Represented By: Ferdose al-Taie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.