Chorley Enterprises, Inc. v. Dickey's Barbecue Restaurant
Plaintiff - Appellee: CHORLEY ENTERPRISES, INC., a Maryland Corporation, MATTHEW CHORLEY and CARLA CHORLEY
Defendant - Appellant: DICKEY'S BARBEQUE RESTAURANTS, INC., a Texas corporation, ROLAND DICKEY, JR. and JERREL DENTON
Case Number: 14-1799
Filed: August 12, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Franchise

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 5, 2015 Summary Chorley Enter. v. Dickey's Barbecue Restaurants

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 405572010 PUBLISHED AUTHORED OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-01650-GLR. [999634557]. [14-1799, 14-1800, 14-1833, 14-1834]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Chorley Enterprises, Inc. v. Dickey's Barbecue Restaurant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: CHORLEY ENTERPRISES, INC., a Maryland Corporation
Represented By: Charles Patteson Cardwell
Represented By: Russell James Gaspar
Represented By: Andrew Kenneth Wible
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: MATTHEW CHORLEY
Represented By: Charles Patteson Cardwell
Represented By: Russell James Gaspar
Represented By: Andrew Kenneth Wible
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: CARLA CHORLEY
Represented By: Charles Patteson Cardwell
Represented By: Russell James Gaspar
Represented By: Andrew Kenneth Wible
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: DICKEY'S BARBEQUE RESTAURANTS, INC., a Texas corporation
Represented By: Precious Murchison Gittens
Represented By: Roger Brian Kaplan
Represented By: Aaron Van Nostrand
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: ROLAND DICKEY, JR.
Represented By: Precious Murchison Gittens
Represented By: Roger Brian Kaplan
Represented By: Aaron Van Nostrand
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: JERREL DENTON
Represented By: Precious Murchison Gittens
Represented By: Roger Brian Kaplan
Represented By: Aaron Van Nostrand
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?