Leonard Arline v. L. Kelly
Petitioner - Appellant: LEONARD H. ARLINE
Respondent - Appellee: L. KELLY, Warden
Case Number: 14-6578
Filed: April 14, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
September 25, 2014 Leonard Arline v. L. Kelly

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 405158601 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying for certificate of appealability Originating case number: 3:06-cv-00261-HEH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999442834]. Mailed to: Arline. [14-6578]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Leonard Arline v. L. Kelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: LEONARD H. ARLINE
Represented By: Leonard H. Arline
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: L. KELLY, Warden
Represented By: Noelle Leigh Shaw-Bell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?