Clorey France v. State of North Carolina
CLOREY EUGENE FRANCE |
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA |
14-6827 |
May 30, 2014 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Prisoner Petitions-Mandamus/Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Clorey France v. State of North Carolina |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 405169631 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999376614-2] Originating case number: 1:13-cv-00250-JAB-LPA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999447753]. Mailed to: Clorey France. [14-6827] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Clorey France v. State of North Carolina | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner - appellant: CLOREY EUGENE FRANCE | |
Represented By: | Clorey Eugene France |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent - appellee: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA | |
Represented By: | Clarence Joe DelForge |
Represented By: | Mary Carla Hollis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.