Gary Williams v. Suffolk Circuit Court
GARY BUTERRA WILLIAMS |
CIRCUIT COURT FOR CITY OF SUFFOLK |
14-6855 |
June 5, 2014 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Prisoner Petitions-Mandamus/Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Gary Williams v. Suffolk Circuit Court |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 405077249 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999381074-2] Originating case number: 3:11-cv-00125-HEH,3:12-cv-00078-HEH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999404598]. Mailed to: appellant. [14-6855] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Gary Williams v. Suffolk Circuit Court | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: GARY BUTERRA WILLIAMS | |
Represented By: | Gary Buterra Williams |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: CIRCUIT COURT FOR CITY OF SUFFOLK | |
Represented By: | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.