Raymond Bethel, Jr. v. Department of State Police
RAYMOND V. BETHEL, JR. |
DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY |
14-7375 |
September 18, 2014 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Raymond Bethel, Jr. v. Department of State Police |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 405238266 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to amend/correct [999454819-2] in 14-7375, denying Motion to amend/correct [999454839-2] in 14-7377 Originating case number: 3:14-cv-00170-HEH-MHL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999479853]. Mailed to: Raymond Bethel, Jr.. [14-7375, 14-7377] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Raymond Bethel, Jr. v. Department of State Police | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: RAYMOND V. BETHEL, JR. | |
Represented By: | Raymond V. Bethel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY | |
Represented By: | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.