Kent Stahle v. CTS Corporation
Plaintiff - Appellant: KENT STAHLE
Defendant - Appellee: CTS CORPORATION
Case Number: 15-1001
Filed: January 2, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 2, 2016 Summary Stahle v. CTS Corp.

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 405852397 PUBLISHED AUTHORED OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00048-MOC-DLH. [999766175]. [15-1001]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Kent Stahle v. CTS Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: KENT STAHLE
Represented By: Joseph Lafayette Anderson
Represented By: Robert Edward Dungan
Represented By: Zephyr Jost
Represented By: James W. Kilbourne
Represented By: Jeffrey Kendal Stahl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: CTS CORPORATION
Represented By: Earl Thomison Holman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?