Biltmore Investments, LTD. v. TD Bank, N.A.
| BILTMORE INVESTMENTS, LTD. |
| TD BANK, N.A. |
| 15-1076 |
| January 21, 2015 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Bankruptcy Appeals Rule 28 USC 158 |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Biltmore Investments, LTD. v. TD Bank, N.A. |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
405647675
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00099-MOC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999670202].. [15-1076]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Biltmore Investments, LTD. v. TD Bank, N.A. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Debtor - appellee: BILTMORE INVESTMENTS, LTD. | |
| Represented By: | Edward Craig Hay |
| Represented By: | David Ray Payne |
| Represented By: | Thomas Scott Tufts |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Creditor - appellant: TD BANK, N.A. | |
| Represented By: | Lance P. Martin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
