Raymond Gill v. US
Plaintiff - Appellant: RAYMOND EDWARD GILL
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 15-4178
Filed: March 25, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 2, 2016 Raymond Gill v. US

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 406138818 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to amend/correct [999709920-2]. Originating case number: 1:13-cr-00577-RDB-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999902279]. [15-4178]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Raymond Gill v. US
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: RAYMOND EDWARD GILL
Represented By: Joseph Murtha
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Paul E. Budlow
Represented By: Sean Richard Delaney
Represented By: Julie Dillon Podlesni
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?