Michael Edward Kennedy v. US Parole Commission
MICHAEL EDWARD KENNEDY |
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION |
15-6535 |
April 14, 2015 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Michael Edward Kennedy v. US Parole Commission |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 405555678 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for bail/release pending appeal (Local Rule 9(a) and (b)) [999615210-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999566242-2] Originating case number: 1:14-cv-01435-CCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999627018]. Mailed to: Kennedy. [15-6535] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Michael Edward Kennedy v. US Parole Commission | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner - appellant: MICHAEL EDWARD KENNEDY | |
Represented By: | Michael Edward Kennedy |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent - appellee: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION | |
Represented By: | Neil R. White |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.