US v. Deshawn Anderson
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| DESHAWN ANDERSON, a/k/a Buddha |
| 15-6670 |
| May 4, 2015 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner Petition-Vacate Sentence |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
405768017
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:09-cr-00414-JCC-2,1:14-cv-00364-JCC,1:09-cr-00414-JCC-3,1:14-cv-00060-JCC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999726219]. Mailed to: Deshawn Anderson SUSSEX II STATE PRISON 24427 Musselwhite Drive Waverly, VA 23891-2222 Marvin Wayne Williams Jr. UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY P. O. Box 1000 Lewisburg, PA 17837-0000. [15-6670]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: US v. Deshawn Anderson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Michael Phillip Ben'Ary |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant: DESHAWN ANDERSON, a/k/a Buddha | |
| Represented By: | Deshawn Anderson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
