Antonio Franklin v. Margaret Bradshaw
Petitioner - Appellant: ANTONIO FRANKLIN
Respondent - Appellee: MARGARET BRADSHAW, Warden
Case Number: 09-3389
Filed: April 9, 2009
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
September 19, 2012 Summary Franklin v. Bradshaw

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6111437978 OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The district court's denial of Franklin's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is AFFIRMED. Decision for publication pursuant to local rule 206. Danny J. Boggs (AUTHORING), R. Guy Cole, Jr., and Julia Smith Gibbons, Circuit Judges.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Antonio Franklin v. Margaret Bradshaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: ANTONIO FRANKLIN
Represented By: S. Adele Shank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: MARGARET BRADSHAW, Warden
Represented By: Justin M. Lovett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?