Stanley Fitzpatrick v. Margaret Bradshaw
Petitioner - Appellant: STANLEY FITZPATRICK
Respondent - Appellee: MARGARET BRADSHAW, Warden
Case Number: 09-4515
Filed: December 14, 2009
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 19, 2013 Summary Fitzpatrick v. Bradshaw

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 6111758174 OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The district court's denial of Fitzpatrick's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is AFFIRMED. Decision for publication. Eric L. Clay (AUTHORING), David W. McKeague, and Raymond M. Kethledge, Circuit Judges.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Stanley Fitzpatrick v. Margaret Bradshaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: STANLEY FITZPATRICK
Represented By: James V. Schuster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: MARGARET BRADSHAW, Warden
Represented By: Holly E. LeClair
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?