Cheryl Lawson v. Charles Godfrey, et al
Defendant: ERIC MERICLE, II
Plaintiff - Appellee: CHERYL LAWSON
Defendant - Appellant: CHARLES H. GODFREY, personally and in his official capacity as Sergeant of the Lima Police Department
Case Number: 15-3063
Filed: January 23, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Cheryl Lawson v. Charles Godfrey, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: CHERYL LAWSON
Represented By: Frederick M. Gittes
Represented By: James E. Yavorcik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: CHARLES H. GODFREY, personally and in his official capacity as Sergeant of the Lima Police Department
Represented By: Jared Alan Wagner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ERIC MERICLE, II
Represented By:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?