Pamela Baye, et al v. Diocese of Rapid City

Plaintiff - Appellant: Pamela Baye and Sylvan Baye
Defendant - Appellee: Diocese of Rapid City, a South Dakota not for profit corporation
Case Number: 10-1690
Filed: March 26, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
January 25, 2011 Pamela Baye, et al v. Diocese of Rapid City

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 25, 2011 811586562 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION FILED - THE COURT: ROGER L. WOLLMAN, DIANA E. MURPHY and STEVEN M. COLLOTON. Diana E. Murphy, Authoring Judge (PUBLISHED) [3748227] [10-1690]
Search for this case: Pamela Baye, et al v. Diocese of Rapid City
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: Pamela Baye
Represented By: Stephanie E. Pochop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: Sylvan Baye
Represented By: Stephanie E. Pochop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: Diocese of Rapid City, a South Dakota not for profit corporation
Represented By: Jeffrey G. Hurd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.