Novus Franchising, Inc. v. Michael Dawson

Plaintiff - Appellant: Novus Franchising, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee: Michael L. Dawson
Defendant: CarMike, Inc.
Case Number: 12-2982
Filed: August 23, 2012
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Trademark

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
August 5, 2013 Summary Novus Franchising, Inc. v. Dawson

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 5, 2013 812229502 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION FILED - THE COURT: James B. Loken, Myron H. Bright and Kermit E. Bye. --AUTHORING JUDGE: Kermit E. Bye -- (PUBLISHED) [4061777] [12-2982]--[Edited 08/05/2013 by MAJ to reflect correct authoring judge.]
Search for this case: Novus Franchising, Inc. v. Michael Dawson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: Novus Franchising, Inc.
Represented By: Kay Nord Hunt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: Michael L. Dawson
Represented By: Michael L. Dawson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CarMike, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.