Gonzalez v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Jose U. Gonzalez
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 1:2007cv02342
Filed: November 7, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Broomfield
Presiding Judge: John L. Kane
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER granting Plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal after review re 34 Notice of Appeal by Jose U. Gonzalez by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 05/20/09. (bjrsl, )
April 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER Affirming Decision. Decision is affirmed, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 4/14/09. (gmssl, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gonzalez v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jose U. Gonzalez
Represented By: Virginia Lee Card Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?