Crabill v. Astrue
| Randle S. Crabill |
| Michael J. Astrue |
| SSA Noticing |
| 1:2011cv02280 |
| August 30, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Denver Office |
| Prowers |
| John L. Kane |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER Approving 24 Motion for Attorney Fees. ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded attorney's fees in the total amount of $4,000.00 under the Equal Access to Justice Act by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 06/20/13.(jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
20
FINAL JUDGMENT. final judgment is hereby entered in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58, in favor or plaintiff Crabill and against the Commissioner, consistent with the United States Supreme Court's decision in Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296-302 (1993). Plaintiff may have his costs, upon the filing of a Bill of Costs within fourteen days of entry of judgment by Clerk on 03/22/13. (jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER. ORDERED that this case is REVERSED AND REMANDED to the Commissioner for further fact finding pursuant to sentence four in 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 03/21/13. (jjhsl, )
|
|
Filing
10
Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases (ORDER) SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 2/6/2012. SS Defendants Brief due by 3/8/2012. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 3/23/2012, by Judge John L. Kane on 1/12/12. (gmssl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
