Rullet et al v. Target Corporation
Plaintiff: Chris Rullet and Nicole Rullet
Defendant: Target Corporation
Case Number: 1:2013cv00411
Filed: February 15, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Office: Denver Office
County: Denver
Presiding Judge: Richard P. Matsch
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, each party to bear their own costs and expenses, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 3/13/2014. (rpmcd)
January 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER Granting 30 Defendant Target's unopposed motion to obtain independent medical examination(s) and exchange repots after the discovery cutoff, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 1/16/2014.(rpmcd)
September 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER TO COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2 in all court filings as to any information to be submitted under restriction based on the 28 Protective Order, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 9/9/2013. (rpmcd )
May 24, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER Setting Second Scheduling Conference for 7/9/2013 at 03:00 PM in Conference Room, lead counsel present in person, no parties permitted, initial disclosures under Rule 26(a)(1) will be completed no later than 10 calendar days before the scheduling conference, and proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on July 3, 2013, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 5/24/2013. (rpmcd )
May 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER Granting 12 Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint and Amended Complaint 13 is accepted for filing, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 5/1/2013.(rpmcd)
February 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference for 4/3/2013 at 11:30 AM in Conference Room, proposed order (original only) on paper, shall be submitted directly to chambers by 4:00 p.m. on March 28, 2013, lead counsel present in person and no parties permitted, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 2/25/2013. (rpmcd )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rullet et al v. Target Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chris Rullet
Represented By: William C. Marlin
Represented By: Michael T. Leinz
Represented By: Frank W. Coppola
Represented By: Marshall Cowles Breit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicole Rullet
Represented By: William C. Marlin
Represented By: Michael T. Leinz
Represented By: Frank W. Coppola
Represented By: Marshall Cowles Breit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Target Corporation
Represented By: John Roland Chase
Represented By: Marianne Laborde
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?