Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05970
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Ide et al v. Target Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation
as 1:2026cv03199
Defendant:
Target Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation
Plaintiff:
Ormal Ide and Wanda Ide
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CANDY v. TARGET CORPORATION et al
as 4:2026cv01659
Defendant:
ROBERT DOE, EMILIO DOE, LUCILLE DOE and others
Plaintiff:
JULIE CANDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
J.O. et al v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv09756
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., Walgreens Co., Target Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Jacklyn Oviedo and J.O.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
LARRY v. TARGET CORPORATION et al
as 5:2026cv06633
Defendant:
DOES 1 through10, inclusive and TARGET CORPORATION
Petitioner:
Kevin L LARRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Ramirez v. Target Corporation
as 3:2026cv03903
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Plaintiff:
Margarita Zamarripa Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv09182
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03696
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Chen v. Target Corporation
as 2:2026cv12991
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Plaintiff:
Arielle Chen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Laurents v. Target Corp of Minnesota
as 5:2026cv04672
Defendant:
Target Corporation of Minnesota
Plaintiff:
Monica Laurents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
