Acker v. King
Plaintiff: Yolanda B. Acker
Defendant: Stephen King
Case Number: 3:2013cv01717
Filed: November 18, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Office: New Haven Office
County: New Haven
Presiding Judge: Alvin W. Thompson
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER: Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 (Doc. No. 32 ) is hereby GRANTED, and the Amended Complaint is dismissed. The Clerk shall close this case. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 9/24/2014. (Wang, M.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Acker v. King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stephen King
Represented By: Jonathan M. Shapiro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yolanda B. Acker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?