Acker v. King
Yolanda B. Acker |
Stephen King |
3:2013cv01717 |
November 18, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
New Haven Office |
New Haven |
Alvin W. Thompson |
Copyrights |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 46 ORDER: Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 (Doc. No. 32 ) is hereby GRANTED, and the Amended Complaint is dismissed. The Clerk shall close this case. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 9/24/2014. (Wang, M.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Acker v. King | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Stephen King | |
Represented By: | Jonathan M. Shapiro |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Yolanda B. Acker | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.