Cases 1 - 10 of 82
(HC) King v. Schuyler
as 2:2023cv02360
Petitioner:
Jesse Stephen King
Respondent:
Charles Schuyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv18045
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN KING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stephen King v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-11180
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEPHEN KING
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Hamman v. University of Central Florida Board of Trustees, et al
as 6:2023cv00395
Plaintiff:
Al Hamman
Defendant:
University of Central Florida Board of Trustees, Alex Martins, Harold Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Daniel King
as 23-10774
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL STEPHEN KING
Jesse King v. Patrick Eaton
as 23-55045
Petitioner / Appellant:
JESSE STEPHEN KING
Respondent / Appellee:
PATRICK EATON
Jesse King v. Patrick Eaton
as 23-55047
Petitioner / Appellant:
JESSE STEPHEN KING
Respondent / Appellee:
PATRICK EATON
Jesse Stephen King v. Patrick Eaton
as 5:2022cv01460
Petitioner:
Jesse Stephen King
Respondent:
Patrick Eaton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vine Energy Operating L P et al v. NRG Oxbow Holdings L L C et al
as 5:2022cv02116
Plaintiff:
VINE ENERGY OPERATING LP, SWN PRODUCTION (LOUISIANA) LLC, Vine Energy Operating L P and others
Defendant:
NRG OXBOW HOLDINGS LLC, ALLBRITTON CATTLE COMPANY, LLC, HEIRS OF SANDY AND JULIA TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Jesse Stephen King v. Patrick Eaton
as 5:2022cv00861
Plaintiff:
Jesse Stephen King
Defendant:
Warden Patrick Eaton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
