Cerilli v. Lamont et al
Raymond J. Cerilli |
Moore, Jane Doe, Carson Wright, John Doe, Colon, Rodney Nickel, Ned Lamont, Hanna, Catz, Thibeault, Furey, Acanto, Hines, Shephard, R. Cook, Sollivan, Katz, Richard Furey, Hannah, John Wright and Shepherd |
3:2020cv01425 |
September 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Kari A Dooley |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 14 AFFIDAVIT by Raymond J. Cerilli. (Fanelle, N.) |
![]() |
Filing 10 EXHIBIT by Raymond J. Cerilli to #9 Amended Complaint. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Ned Lamont, Rodney Nickel, Carson Wright, Katz, Richard Furey, John Wright, Hannah, Sollivan, filed by Raymond J. Cerilli. (Oliver, T.) |
![]() |
Filing 7 PRISCS - MOTION for copy(s) by Raymond J. Cerilli. (Fazekas, J.) Modified on 10/9/2020 (Gould, K.). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 3 PRISCS - Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Raymond J. Cerilli. (Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 2 PRISCS - MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Raymond J. Cerilli. (Fazekas, J.) Modified on 10/9/2020 (Gould, K.). |
Filing 1 PRISCS - COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Raymond J. Cerilli. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Envelope)(Fazekas, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.