Cases 1 - 10 of 129
AL QADOMI et al v. Lamont et al
as 3:2024cv01852
Plaintiff:
TOBACCO TOWN LLC d/b/a Puff City Bridgeport, TOBACCO TOWN LLC d/b/a Puff City Guilford, BROTHERS P.C. LLC d/b/a Puff City Milford and others
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, William Tong, COMMISSIONER OF THE BRYAN CAFFERELLI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sullivan v. Powell et al
as 3:2024cv01857
Defendant:
Xi Jinping, Jerome Powell, Ned Lamont and others
Plaintiff:
Anna Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ford v. Ivey, et al
as 24-8031
Respondent:
MICHAEL J. DUNLEAVY, RONALD D. DESANTIS, BRIAN KEMP and others
Petitioner:
LARRY DONNELL FORD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01486
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Sullivan v. Bezos et al
as 3:2024cv01390
Defendant:
Joseph Biden, Kim Kardashian, David Rothschild and others
Plaintiff:
Anna Sullivan
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01405
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ratches v. Guerrera et al
as 3:2024cv01319
Plaintiff:
Jake Ratches
Defendant:
Tony Guerrera and Ned Lamont
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Johnson v. State of Connecticut
as 24-2050
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Civil Rights Division, Local Office, STEPHEN BYERS, Staff Attorney, JENNIFER LEPORE, Staff Attorney and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY JOHNSON
Sullivan v. Lamont et al
as 3:2024cv01003
Defendant:
Kim Kardashian, Anne Lamont, Nancy Peloski and others
Plaintiff:
Anna Sullivan
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
