Meg K. Smart v. Michael J. Astrue

Meg K. Smart v. Michael J. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Meg K. Smart
Defendant:	Michael J. Astrue
Case Number:	2:2008cv08243
Filed:	December 15, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Office:	Western Division - Los Angeles Office
County:	Los Angeles
Presiding Judge:	Chooljian
Presiding Judge:	Wright
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 12, 2010	Filing 25 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 24 . Based upon the parties' Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees, IT IS ORDERED that the Commissioner shall pay to Plaintiff the amount of $4,665.22, as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation. (hr)
January 13, 2010	Filing 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF REMAND by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is reversed in part, and this matter is remanded for further administrative action consistent with this Opinion. See memorandum for details. (hr)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 12, 2010

Filing 25 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 24 . Based upon the parties' Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees, IT IS ORDERED that the Commissioner shall pay to Plaintiff the amount of $4,665.22, as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation. (hr)

January 13, 2010

Filing 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF REMAND by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is reversed in part, and this matter is remanded for further administrative action consistent with this Opinion. See memorandum for details. (hr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Meg K. Smart v. Michael J. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Meg K. Smart
Represented By:	Joel D Leidner
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?