WILDER v. BECK
Petitioner: CEDRIC LAMAR WILDER
Respondent: THEODIS BECK
Case Number: 1:2008cv00525
Filed: July 30, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Surry
Presiding Judge: UNASSIGNED
Presiding Judge: RUSSELL A. ELIASON
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 3, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDED RULING - MAGISTRATE JUDGE signed by MAG/JUDGE RUSSELL A. ELIASON on 12/3/08 re 5 MOTION to Dismiss (Statute of Limitations) filed by THEODIS BECK be granted, the the petition [Docket No. 2] be dismissed, and the Judgment be entered dismissing this action. (Wilson, JoAnne)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WILDER v. BECK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: CEDRIC LAMAR WILDER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: THEODIS BECK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?