Vindicator Printing Company v. Northeast Industries, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Vindicator Printing Company
Defendant: Northeast Industries, Inc., Sam W. Boyles and Lessie Boyles
Counter-Claimant: Northeast Industries, Inc.
Counter-Defendant: Vindicator Printing Company
Case Number: 4:2009cv01973
Filed: August 21, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Youngstown Office
County: Mahoning
Presiding Judge: John R. Adams
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 62 Memorandum Opinion and Order: Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment against defendants Sam Boyles and Lessie Boyles is granted as to the breach of contract claim, and denied as to the promissory estoppel claim; judgment is rendered in f avor of plaintiff and against defendants Sam Boyles and Lessie Boyles in the amount of $250,000, as well as expenses and attorney fees; plaintiff shall submit an itemization of expenses and attorneys' fees, as well as a supporting affidavit , to the Court on or before 8/12/11; further, based upon the entry of judgment on the breach of contract claim, the promissory estoppel claim is dismissed sua sponte as a matter of law (Related document 60 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert on 8/5/11. (S,AA)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vindicator Printing Company v. Northeast Industries, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vindicator Printing Company
Represented By: David L. Marburger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Northeast Industries, Inc.
Represented By: Gil Shaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sam W. Boyles
Represented By: Gil Shaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lessie Boyles
Represented By: Gil Shaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter-claimant: Northeast Industries, Inc.
Represented By: Gil Shaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter-defendant: Vindicator Printing Company
Represented By: David L. Marburger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?