Barringer v. Clackamas County et al
Agnes Laurie Barringer |
Clackamas County and Deputy A. Davis |
3:2009cv00068 |
January 16, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Civil Rights: Other Office |
Clackamas |
John V. Acosta |
None |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 117 ORDER ON OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBITS (re: Motion in limine - Defendant's Objection to Plaintiff's Exhibit #5 98 Defendants' Objections 101 . IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of May, 2012, by U.S. Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (see attached order for details) (peg) |
Filing 110 OPINION and ORDER - For the reasons stated, Barringer's motion 100 for leave to amend is DENIED. Dated this 3rd day of May, 2012, by U.S. Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg) |
Filing 52 ORDER: Denying Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 35 ); Adopting Findings and Recommendation 47 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Barringer's Amended Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 35 is denied. Barringer's claims for common law negligence against Deputy Davis and the County are dismissed. Signed on 12/21/10 by Judge Garr M. King. (dmd) |
Filing 47 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATION - Barringer's Amended Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 35 should be DENIED. Further, Barringer's claims for common law negligence against Deputy Davis and the County should be DISMISSED. Objections to the Findings and Recommendation are due by 12/7/2010. Dated this 22nd day of November, 2010, by U.S. Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta. (peg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.