District Court Cases in Oregon
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,000
Belt v. Rayfield et al
as 1:2026cv01730
Plaintiff:
Neil Jadrian Belt
Defendant:
Dan Rayfield, Patrick Green and Nancy J. Cozine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frame v. Geico Secure Insurance Company
as 3:2026cv01728
Petitioner:
Cody Frame
Respondent:
Geico Secure Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv01734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Modular Building Institute v. Stephenson
as 3:2026cv01727
Plaintiff:
Modular Building Institute
Defendant:
Christina Stephenson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Depue v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 1:2026cv01732
Plaintiff:
Shawn Depue
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv01733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Pioneer Utility Resources, Inc. v. Portland Web Design, Inc.
as 3:2026cv01724
Plaintiff:
Pioneer Utility Resources, Inc.
Defendant:
Portland Web Design, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Miller v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2026cv01723
Plaintiff:
John Lawrence Miller
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Planar Systems, Inc. v. Neoti, LLC
as 3:2026cv01722
Plaintiff:
Planar Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Neoti, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
